目录
测试环境
表结构
CASE1
结果
CASE 2
结果
CASE 3
结果
TPS修正
CASE 4
结果
结论
测试环境
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790 CPU @ 3.60GHz
32G memory
SSD harddisk.
postgresql.conf
max_connections = 256
shared_buffers = 3GB # min 128kB
work_mem = 16MB # min 64kB
maintenance_work_mem = 256MB # min 1MB
wal_buffers = 4MB
checkpoint_timeout = 10min # range 30s-1d
max_wal_size = 2GB
checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9
表结构
zj_testdb=# \d+ t1
Table "public.t1"
Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default | Storage | Stats target | Description
--------+--------+-----------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+-------------
c1 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c2 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c3 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c4 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c5 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c6 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c7 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c8 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c9 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c10 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c11 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c12 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c13 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c14 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c15 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c16 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c17 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c18 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c19 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c20 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c21 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c22 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c23 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c24 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c25 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c26 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c27 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c28 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c29 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c30 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c31 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c32 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c33 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c34 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c35 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c36 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c37 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c38 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c39 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c40 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c41 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c42 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c43 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c44 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c45 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c46 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c47 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c48 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c49 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c50 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c51 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c52 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c53 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c54 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c55 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c56 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c57 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c58 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c59 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c60 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c61 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c62 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c63 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c64 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c65 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c66 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c67 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c68 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c69 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c70 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c71 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c72 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c73 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c74 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c75 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c76 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c77 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c78 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c79 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c80 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c81 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c82 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c83 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c84 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c85 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c86 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c87 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c88 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c89 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c90 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c91 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c92 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c93 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c94 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c95 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c96 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c97 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c98 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c99 | bigint | | | | plain | |
c100 | bigint | | | | plain | |
Tablespace: "zj_tablespace"CASE1
batchsize=100, 8 threads
test_insert.sql
[root@server4 zjcktest]# cat test_insert.sql
insert into t1 select generate_series(1,100),1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
copy csv
copy (select generate_series(1,100),1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) to '/data/zjcktest/csv'; copy.sql
[root@server4 zjcktest]# cat copy.sql
copy t1 from '/data/zjcktest/csv' ;INSERT:
pgbench -M prepared -n -r -P 1 -f /data/zjcktest/test_insert.sql -h 127.0.0.1 -p 5432 -U postgres zj_testdb -c 8 -j 8 -T 120
COPY:
pgbench -M prepared -n -r -P 1 -f /data/zjcktest/copy.sql -h 127.0.0.1 -p 5432 -U postgres zj_testdb -c 8 -j 8 -T 120 结果
两者速率相差不大，copy略快5%
| 8 threads batchsize=100 | 行数 | 事务数 | TPS |
| batch 100 insert select | 12022100 | 120221 | 1000.835 |
| batch 100 copy | 12771100 | 127711 | 1057.615 |
| batch 100 insert select | 12945500 | 129455 | 1077.917 |
| batch 100 copy | 13552200 | 135522 | 1120.751 |
| batch 100 insert select | 13164900 | 131649 | 1092.143 |
| batch 100 copy | 13299600 | 132996 | 1107.717 |
CASE 2
1 thread, batchsize=100
修改pgbench执行命令
INSERT:
pgbench -M prepared -n -r -P 1 -f /data/zjcktest/test_insert.sql -h 127.0.0.1 -p 5432 -U postgres zj_testdb -c 1 -j 1 -T 120
COPY:
pgbench -M prepared -n -r -P 1 -f /data/zjcktest/copy.sql -h 127.0.0.1 -p 5432 -U postgres zj_testdb -c 1 -j 1 -T 120 结果
比8线程慢25%。 copy和insert很接近，insert比copy略好3%。
| 1 thread, batchsize=100 | 行数 | 事务数 | TPS |
| batch 100 insert select | 9003100 | 90031 | 750.254 |
| batch 100 copy | 8903700 | 89037 | 741.454 |
| batch 100 insert select | 8971300 | 89713 | 747.577 |
| batch 100 copy | 8798700 | 87987 | 733.224 |
| batch 100 insert select | 8839900 | 88399 | 736.622 |
| batch 100 copy | 8776300 | 87763 | 731.356 |
| batch 100 insert select | 9042900 | 90429 | 753.572 |
| batch 100 copy | 8827400 | 88274 | 735.607 |
CASE 3
1 thread, batchsize=1000
copy (select generate_series(1,1000),1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) to '/data/zjcktest/csv';
[root@server4 zjcktest]# cat test_insert.sql
insert into t1 select generate_series(1,1000),1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
结果
仍旧insert稍快 4%。
| 1 thread, batchsize=1000 | 行数 | 事务数 | TPS |
| batch 100 insert select | 11179000 | 11179 | 93 |
| batch 100 copy | 10794000 | 10794 | 89.948 |
TPS修正
考虑到copy需要读取文件，按照金士顿 SSD 读取500MB/s来计算
| 总读取字节 | 读取速率 | cost time | 修正后TPS |
| 2179233042 | 524288000 | 4.16 s | 93.18 |
去掉读文件的时间，总的TPS和insert几乎一致。
CASE 4
1 thread, batchsize = 1
修改test_insert.sql 和 重新生成copy文件csv
cat test_insert.sql
insert into t1 values (5,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1)
zj_testdb=# copy (select 5,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) to '/data/zjcktest/csv'; 结果
| 1 thread, batchsize=1 | 行数 | 事务数 | TPS |
| insert | 835632 | 835632 | 6963.591 |
| copy | 696941 | 696941 | 5807.831 |
结论
在test_insert.sql中，使用generate_series 而不是显示一行一行insert语句的情况下，insert 整体性能和copy基本一致，单线程情况下insert性能更好。
对比test_insert.sql里有100行insert语句的测试，这里少了绝大部分的SQL语句的解析，性能与copy一样甚至超过。
